Free Amazon AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate DEA-C01 Exam Questions

Option C is correct because the company only needs to keep the original files for 90 days and then delete them. AWS states that S3 Lifecycle can be used to delete expired objects automatically, which directly matches this requirement. There is no need to transition the objects to another storage class because the files are not needed beyond day 90. Adding a transition step would add complexity and, in this case, would not improve cost-effectiveness.

Option A is not optimal because S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval has a 90-day minimum storage duration and is intended for longer-term archival. Transitioning objects right before deleting them is unnecessary overhead and can add minimum-duration charges. Option B is incorrect because Object Lock is for retention and write-once-read-many protection, not for normal temporary retention with lowest cost. Option D is also less cost-effective because S3 Intelligent-Tiering is useful when access patterns are uncertain, but here the retention period and deletion timing are already known. The simplest and cheapest solution is to keep the originals in S3 Standard for the required 90 days and then expire them with Lifecycle.

When a denormalized table is growing in size and lacks a suitable distribution key column, the ALL distribution style is the best choice for maintenance with minimal overhead:

• ALL distribution: Copies the entire table to all nodes, eliminating distribution key concerns
• Best for smaller dimension tables or situations where no good distribution key exists
• Provides excellent query performance since all join operations have all data available locally on each node

While ALL distribution increases storage and has overhead during updates, it requires the least maintenance effort compared to alternatives:

• EVEN distribution (default): Distributes data round-robin; acceptable but can lead to uneven node utilization
• KEY distribution: Requires identifying a suitable key, which is explicitly stated as unavailable in this scenario

For a growing denormalized table without a suitable key, ALL distribution minimizes maintenance complexity while maintaining query performance.

The company wants to gather information about incomplete multipart uploads and outdated versions in its Amazon S3 buckets to optimize storage costs.

Option B: Use Amazon S3 Inventory configurations reports to gather the information.S3 Inventory provides reports that can list incomplete multipart uploads and versions of objects stored in S3. It offers an easy, automated way to track object metadata across buckets, including data necessary for cost optimization, without manual effort.

Options A (AWS CLI), C (S3 Storage Lens), and D (usage reports) either do not specifically gather the required information about incomplete uploads and outdated versions or require more manual intervention.

Amazon S3 Inventory Documentation

Option A is the correct answer because it meets the requirements with the least operational overhead. Creating an S3 event notification that has an event type of s3:ObjectCreated:* will trigger the Lambda function whenever a new object is created in the S3 bucket. Using a filter rule to generate notifications only when the suffix includes .csv will ensure that the Lambda function only runs for .csv files. Setting the ARN of the Lambda function as the destination for the event notification will directly invoke the Lambda function without any additional steps.

Option B is incorrect because it requires the user to tag the objects with .csv, which adds an extra step and increases the operational overhead.

Option C is incorrect because it uses an event type of s3:*, which will trigger the Lambda function for any S3 event, not just object creation. This could result in unnecessary invocations and increased costs.

Option D is incorrect because it involves creating and subscribing to an SNS topic, which adds an extra layer of complexity and operational overhead.

AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate DEA-C01 Complete Study Guide, Chapter 3: Data Ingestion and Transformation, Section 3.2: S3 Event Notifications and Lambda Functions, Pages 67-69

Building Batch Data Analytics Solutions on AWS, Module 4: Data Transformation, Lesson 4.2: AWS Lambda, Pages 4-8

AWS Documentation Overview, AWS Lambda Developer Guide, Working with AWS Lambda Functions, Configuring Function Triggers, Using AWS Lambda with Amazon S3, Pages 1-5

The optimal solution for near-real-time querying and visualization of logs is to integrate Amazon CloudWatch Logs with Amazon OpenSearch Service using subscription filters, which stream the logs directly into OpenSearch for querying and dashboarding:

''Use OpenSearch Service with CloudWatch Logs and create a subscription filter to stream log data in near real time into OpenSearch. Then use OpenSearch dashboards for visualization.''

-- Ace the AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate Certification - version 2 - apple.pdf

This approach offers low latency and avoids batch exports, unlike the scheduled Athena + S3 pattern.

The correct answer is B because HNSW with the Faiss engine is the best fit when the system needs approximate k-NN search over millions of high-dimensional vectors while maintaining low latency and strong recall. OpenSearch approximate k-NN is designed for large, high-dimensional datasets where brute-force exact search becomes inefficient, and OpenSearch documentation shows HNSW configured with the Faiss engine for knn_vector fields. Exact search with a scoring script is accurate but does not scale well for 5 million vectors under a strict latency requirement. IVF can scale but usually requires training and tuning and may trade off recall. Binary quantization reduces memory but can reduce accuracy. Therefore, HNSW with Faiss is the strongest exam answer.

To allow cross-account access to a Kinesis Data Stream, you must add a resource-based policy to the Kinesis stream in Account A, explicitly granting the Lambda execution role in Account B the required permissions.

SCPs (A & C) set permissions boundaries, but do not grant access.

Option D incorrectly refers to the Lambda function -- but the Kinesis resource must allow access.

''You must add a resource-based policy to the Kinesis Data Stream in Account A to allow a Lambda function in Account B to consume from the stream.''

Amazon Aurora zero-ETL integration with Amazon Redshift Serverless is designed specifically to provide near real-time analytics on transactional data with minimal operational overhead. This integration continuously replicates changes from Aurora MySQL databases into Redshift Serverless without requiring data pipelines, replication tasks, or infrastructure management.

Because the requirement emphasizes near real-time latency and minimal management, zero-ETL integration is the optimal choice. It eliminates the need to configure and monitor AWS DMS tasks, manage Glue jobs, or build and scale Lambda-based ingestion logic. Schema changes, data synchronization, and replication are handled automatically by AWS.

AWS DMS Serverless, while managed, still requires task configuration and monitoring and typically introduces more latency than zero-ETL integrations. AWS Glue jobs and Lambda functions require custom code, scheduling, and error handling, increasing both complexity and maintenance effort.

Therefore, setting up Aurora zero-ETL integration with Amazon Redshift Serverless best satisfies the requirements and aligns with AWS best practices for modern analytics architectures.

AWS Lake Formation is a service that helps you build, secure, and manage data lakes on Amazon S3. You can use AWS Lake Formation to register the S3 path as a data lake location, and enable fine-grained access control to limit access to the records based on the HR department's Region. You can use data filters to specify which S3 prefixes or partitions each HR department can access, and grant permissions to the IAM roles of the HR departments accordingly.This solution will meet the requirement with the least operational overhead, as it simplifies the data lake management and security, and leverages the existing IAM roles of the HR departments12.

The other options are not optimal for the following reasons:

A . Use data filters for each Region to register the S3 paths as data locations. This option is not possible, as data filters are not used to register S3 paths as data locations, but to grant permissions to access specific S3 prefixes or partitions within a data location. Moreover, this option does not specify how to limit access to the records based on the HR department's Region.

C . Modify the IAM roles of the HR departments to add a data filter for each department's Region. This option is not possible, as data filters are not added to IAM roles, but to permissions granted by AWS Lake Formation. Moreover, this option does not specify how to register the S3 path as a data lake location, or how to enable fine-grained access control in AWS Lake Formation.

E . Create a separate S3 bucket for each Region. Configure an IAM policy to allow S3 access. Restrict access based on Region. This option is not recommended, as it would require more operational overhead to create and manage multiple S3 buckets, and to configure and maintain IAM policies for each HR department. Moreover, this option does not leverage the benefits of AWS Lake Formation, such as data cataloging, data transformation, and data governance.

1: AWS Lake Formation

2: AWS Lake Formation Permissions

AWS Identity and Access Management

Amazon S3

Option B is the only solution that supports near real-time updates from a continuously changing source to Amazon Redshift. The requirement says the on-premises PostgreSQL database is ''continuously updated'' and the target must be updated ''as quickly as possible.'' Nightly full backups or nightly full loads (Options A and D) inherently introduce at least a daily lag, which violates the freshness requirement. Similarly, exporting with pg_dump and reloading with COPY (Option C) is a batch approach and does not provide continuous change propagation.

The study material explicitly positions AWS Database Migration Service (DMS) for database migrations and highlights that it supports both full-load and change data capture (CDC), and that CDC enables continuous replication so ongoing changes can be applied after the initial load.

Therefore, a DMS task configured for full load + CDC provides the fastest ongoing synchronization pattern: it performs the initial migration and then continuously captures and applies changes so Redshift stays current with minimal delay compared to periodic batch reloads.

The best solution to cost optimize the company's use of Amazon Athena without adding any additional infrastructure costs is to use the query result reuse feature of Amazon Athena for the SQL queries.This feature allows you to run the same query multiple times without incurring additional charges, as long as the underlying data has not changed and the query results are still in the query result location in Amazon S31. This feature is useful for scenarios where you have a petabyte-scale dataset that is updated infrequently, such as once a day, and you have a BI application that runs the same queries repeatedly, such as every hour. By using the query result reuse feature, you can reduce the amount of data scanned by your queries and save on the cost of running Athena.You can enable or disable this feature at the workgroup level or at the individual query level1.

Option A is not the best solution, as configuring an Amazon S3 Lifecycle policy to move data to the S3 Glacier Deep Archive storage class after 1 day would not cost optimize the company's use of Amazon Athena, but rather increase the cost and complexity.Amazon S3 Lifecycle policies are rules that you can define to automatically transition objects between different storage classes based on specified criteria, such as the age of the object2.S3 Glacier Deep Archive is the lowest-cost storage class in Amazon S3, designed for long-term data archiving that is accessed once or twice in a year3.While moving data to S3 Glacier Deep Archive can reduce the storage cost, it would also increase the retrieval cost and latency, as it takes up to 12 hours to restore the data from S3 Glacier Deep Archive3.Moreover, Athena does not support querying data that is in S3 Glacier or S3 Glacier Deep Archive storage classes4. Therefore, using this option would not meet the requirements of running on-demand SQL queries on the dataset.

Option C is not the best solution, as adding an Amazon ElastiCache cluster between the BI application and Athena would not cost optimize the company's use of Amazon Athena, but rather increase the cost and complexity. Amazon ElastiCache is a service that offers fully managed in-memory data stores, such as Redis and Memcached, that can improve the performance and scalability of web applications by caching frequently accessed data. While using ElastiCache can reduce the latency and load on the BI application, it would not reduce the amount of data scanned by Athena, which is the main factor that determines the cost of running Athena. Moreover, using ElastiCache would introduce additional infrastructure costs and operational overhead, as you would have to provision, manage, and scale the ElastiCache cluster, and integrate it with the BI application and Athena.

Option D is not the best solution, as changing the format of the files that are in the dataset to Apache Parquet would not cost optimize the company's use of Amazon Athena without adding any additional infrastructure costs, but rather increase the complexity. Apache Parquet is a columnar storage format that can improve the performance of analytical queries by reducing the amount of data that needs to be scanned and providing efficient compression and encoding schemes. However, changing the format of the files that are in the dataset to Apache Parquet would require additional processing and transformation steps, such as using AWS Glue or Amazon EMR to convert the files from their original format to Parquet, and storing the converted files in a separate location in Amazon S3. This would increase the complexity and the operational overhead of the data pipeline, and also incur additional costs for using AWS Glue or Amazon EMR.Reference:

Query result reuse

Amazon S3 Lifecycle

S3 Glacier Deep Archive

Storage classes supported by Athena

[What is Amazon ElastiCache?]

[Amazon Athena pricing]

[Columnar Storage Formats]

AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate DEA-C01 Complete Study Guide

The company's Apache Spark ETL job on Amazon EMR uses high CPU but low memory, meaning that compute-optimized EC2 instances would be the most cost-effective choice. These instances are designed for high-performance compute applications, where CPU usage is high, but memory needs are minimal, which is exactly the case here.

Compute Optimized Instances:

Compute-optimized instances, such as the C5 series, provide a higher ratio of CPU to memory, which is more suitable for jobs with high CPU usage and relatively low memory consumption.

Switching from general-purpose EC2 instances to compute-optimized instances can reduce costs while improving performance, as these instances are optimized for workloads like Spark jobs that perform a lot of computation.

Managed Scaling: The EMR cluster's scaling is currently managed between 1 and 5 nodes, so changing the instance type will leverage the current scaling strategy but optimize it for the workload.

Alternatives Considered:

A (Increase task nodes to 10): Increasing the number of task nodes would increase costs without necessarily improving performance. Since memory usage is low, the bottleneck is more likely the CPU, which compute-optimized instances can handle better.

B (Memory optimized instances): Memory-optimized instances are not suitable since the current job is CPU-bound, and memory usage remains low (under 30%).

D (Reduce scaling cooldown): This could marginally improve scaling speed but does not address the need for cost optimization and improved CPU performance.

Amazon EMR Cluster Optimization

Compute Optimized EC2 Instances

Apache Iceberg is a table format designed for large-scale data lakes that supports ACID transactions, schema evolution, time travel, and row-level updates and deletes. Using S3 Tables with Apache Iceberg provides a fully managed experience that integrates natively with Amazon Athena, Amazon Redshift, and Amazon EMR.

By using AWS Glue with the Iceberg catalog, the data engineer can perform daily updates and deletions without managing Spark clusters, compaction scheduling, or metadata cleanup manually. Iceberg handles snapshots, file pruning, and unreferenced file removal automatically, significantly reducing operational overhead.

Apache Hudi requires Amazon EMR clusters, Spark jobs, and manual compaction orchestration, increasing complexity. The Parquet-only approaches in options C and D do not support updates or deletes efficiently and would require full rewrites of datasets, which is not scalable.

Therefore, using S3 Tables with Apache Iceberg provides the most efficient, scalable, and low-maintenance solution that satisfies all query and update requirements.

AWS Glue is a fully managed service that provides a serverless data integration platform. It can automatically discover and categorize data from various sources, including SAP HANA, Microsoft SQL Server, MongoDB, Apache Kafka, and Amazon DynamoDB. It can also infer the schema of the data and store it in the AWS Glue Data Catalog, which is a central metadata repository. AWS Glue can then use the schema information to generate and run Apache Spark code to extract, transform, and load the data into an Amazon S3 bucket. AWS Glue can also monitor and optimize the performance and cost of the data pipeline, and handle any schema changes that may occur in the source data. AWS Glue can meet the SLA of loading the data into the S3 bucket within 15 minutes of data creation, as it can trigger the data pipeline based on events, schedules, or on-demand. AWS Glue has the least operational overhead among the options, as it does not require provisioning, configuring, or managing any servers or clusters. It also handles scaling, patching, and security automatically.Reference:

AWS Glue

[AWS Glue Data Catalog]

[AWS Glue Developer Guide]

AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate DEA-C01 Complete Study Guide

Amazon Athena is a serverless interactive query service that allows you to analyze data in Amazon S3 using standard SQL. Athena supports various data formats, such as CSV, JSON, ORC, Avro, and Parquet. However, not all data formats are equally efficient for querying. Some data formats, such as CSV and JSON, are row-oriented, meaning that they store data as a sequence of records, each with the same fields. Row-oriented formats are suitable for loading and exporting data, but they are not optimal for analytical queries that often access only a subset of columns. Row-oriented formats also do not support compression or encoding techniques that can reduce the data size and improve the query performance.

On the other hand, some data formats, such as ORC and Parquet, are column-oriented, meaning that they store data as a collection of columns, each with a specific data type. Column-oriented formats are ideal for analytical queries that often filter, aggregate, or join data by columns. Column-oriented formats also support compression and encoding techniques that can reduce the data size and improve the query performance. For example, Parquet supports dictionary encoding, which replaces repeated values with numeric codes, and run-length encoding, which replaces consecutive identical values with a single value and a count. Parquet also supports various compression algorithms, such as Snappy, GZIP, and ZSTD, that can further reduce the data size and improve the query performance.

Therefore, creating an AWS Glue extract, transform, and load (ETL) job to read from the .csv structured data source and writing the data into the data lake in Apache Parquet format will meet the requirements most cost-effectively. AWS Glue is a fully managed service that provides a serverless data integration platform for data preparation, data cataloging, and data loading. AWS Glue ETL jobs allow you to transform and load data from various sources into various targets, using either a graphical interface (AWS Glue Studio) or a code-based interface (AWS Glue console or AWS Glue API). By using AWS Glue ETL jobs, you can easily convert the data from CSV to Parquet format, without having to write or manage any code. Parquet is a column-oriented format that allows Athena to scan only the relevant columns and skip the rest, reducing the amount of data read from S3. This solution will also reduce the cost of Athena queries, as Athena charges based on the amount of data scanned from S3.

The other options are not as cost-effective as creating an AWS Glue ETL job to write the data into the data lake in Parquet format. Using an AWS Glue PySpark job to ingest the source data into the data lake in .csv format will not improve the query performance or reduce the query cost, as .csv is a row-oriented format that does not support columnar access or compression. Creating an AWS Glue ETL job to ingest the data into the data lake in JSON format will not improve the query performance or reduce the query cost, as JSON is also a row-oriented format that does not support columnar access or compression. Using an AWS Glue PySpark job to ingest the source data into the data lake in Apache Avro format will improve the query performance, as Avro is a column-oriented format that supports compression and encoding, but it will require more operational effort, as you will need to write and maintain PySpark code to convert the data from CSV to Avro format.Reference:

Amazon Athena

Choosing the Right Data Format

AWS Glue

[AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate DEA-C01 Complete Study Guide], Chapter 5: Data Analysis and Visualization, Section 5.1: Amazon Athena